I can't think about/watch either Charlie's Angels film for too long without contemplating a lobotomy...so in order to cut down on the pain I decided to review them simultaneously, and grade them together.
"You're a woman, you've got female intuition, *and* you're a detective... and you didn't know this was going to happen?"
This is the story of 3 young women with very different lives, which ultimately aren't important, who all eventually became part of an elite crime fighting unit called the Angels for a man named Charlie. The Angels are ditzy nerd Natalie (Diaz), biker babe Dylan (Barrymore), and intelligent/well to do Alex (Liu), or as Roger
Ebert explains: the movie is about looking at Barrymore's chest, Diaz's butt, and Liu's hair. They fight crime, aided (or in some cases hindered) by Bosley (Murray).
The plot doesn't matter. But basically a businessman (Rockwell) is kidnapped by his rival (Tim Curry) and it is up to the Angels to make everything better. These women look great (even when fighting, and manage to escape with only minor cuts and scratches). The possibilities are endless...and they made a sequel to this?
Charlie's Angels (2000) 98 minutes
Rating: PG-13 for action violence, innuendo and some sensuality/nudity
Director: McG
Starring: Cameron Diaz as Natalie Cook
Drew Barrymore as Dylan Sanders
Lucy Liu as Alex Munday
Bill Murray as John Bosley
Sam Rockwell as Eric Knox
Charlies Angels: Full Throttle (2003)